Hated: The Women of the G.O.P.

"Let Republicans be Republicans." The majority of liberals take on a passive attitude when dealing with conservatives. Liberals, you see, are terrified at the thought of having to defend one of their arguments and consequently avoid confrontation. AT a recent social gathering I indulged my ego: I started a logical line of questioning with a liberal who supported universal healthcare. I asked him "Let's say I can afford my doctor bills and you can't. You say that the government should use my tax dollars to pay your bills. Here's my question: what did I do to you to incur a debt> What did I do and at what point did I begin to owe you healthcare?" At this point, in any argument with a liberal, they will do one of three things: a) bring up George Bush (no matter how irrelevant) b) consult the opinion of a celebrity, preferably Bono c) change the subject The most common response is the latter- Sheepishly shying away from a response. They smirk or roll their eyes as if to say "ohhhh you conservatives." A conversation with these irresponsible idiots usually ends there. That is, unless you look like Carrie Prejean or Sarah Palin- two beautiful women who happen to hold conservative opinions. You see, liberals are completely fine with crotchety men being conservatives. Mitt Romney? "Sure, have him." John McCain? "Take him." Sarah Palin? "Not so fast!" Does it not strike you a little odd that the vice presidential candidate from 2008 drummed up so much controversy? Her views were no different than most other conservatives. So why did she get the beating from liberals? I can hear you liberals now "we didn't attack Sarah any more than we did John McCain!" NOT true. Look at any of their hippy marches and protests...look at their facebook groups. SO many have some kind of anti-Palin paraphernalia. Back to my question: why the hatred towards women like Palin and Prejean? Why? Because they are beautiful. They are beautiful women who happen to be conservatives. Pretty pro-lifers who oppose gay marriage make liberals foam at the mouth and not in the good way. You see, most of Hollywood are gorgeous and hysterically liberal. For liberals, it's like Carrie and Sarah crossed the picket line- regular scabs! Being beautiful and not supporting universal healthcare and/or gay marriage??? BLASPHEMOUS!!! And why? Because she's hot! We like to think that we are different now than we were in high school- more grown up and mature. But the facts are, we really aren't. Turn on any reality TV show and you will stumble upon a universal truth that's been the same since the playground in kindergarden- the pretty girl is the hated girl. Hated, usually, by the ugly girls. Folks, its no different when it comes to politics. Why is it that a 65 year old congressman or even Barack Obama himself can say they don't support gay marriage and nobody bats an eyelash but when Miss California does people gnash their teeth? Again, because Prejean is a beautiful woman. Every ugly woman came out of the woodwork to attack this girl. She didn't say she was against any bill . She never expressed her views regarding state and federal recognition of gay marriage. These were simply HER views- how she was brought up. Here is her full answer: "Well, I think it's great that Americans are able to choose one way or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. You know what, in my country, in my family, I do believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, no offense to anybody out there. But that's how I was raised, and I believe that it should be between a man and a woman." So tell me again how much you ugly ones out there hate her. Tell me again how bigoted she is. As for my views on the subject...its rather irrelevant to this article but I will say that I am against government passing discriminatory legislation based on religion. That said, I believe government has absolutely no place in any nuptial agreement- straight or gay. The issue is religious, not governmental. Anyways, I digress. The point is this: society refuses to tolerate conservative views held by attractive women such as Palin and Prejean. And who screams the loudest for their heads on a platter? The ugly chicks.

Response to WSJ- Opinion: Obama's Radicalism Is Killing the Dow

ARTICLE: http://online.wsj.com/wsjgate?subURI=%2Farticle%2FSB123629969453946717-email.html&nonsubURI=%2Farticle_email%2FSB123629969453946717-lMyQjAxMDI5MzA2OTIwOTk5Wj.html

I agree with a great deal of what the author says but the fact that he says that he thinks we need "more financial rescue" tells me he is no different than Obama. When did we become a population who's financial success is so intimately intertwined with government?? Well, Jan 20 would be somewhere on that timeline...

Here is the most important sentence: "Mr. Obama's $3.6 trillion budget blueprint, by his own admission, redefines the role of government in our economy and society."

When the founding fathers authored out Constitution, government was theretofore designed to exist solely for the protection of our rights to life, liberty, and property. Obama has made a RADICAL change, that we know and is indisputable. But the change is much more than spending a lot more money than usual and perhaps even sinister. Obama has rewritten the role of our government from a protector to a provider.

It is essential that you realize Obama has no incentive to watch the market rise. That is not his goal. The ultimate goal of the democratic party is to create a permanent voter base. How do they do this? By making the American people further dependent on government. The equation is simple- The worse the economy gets, the more people are in need (perceived). The more people are in need, the more dependent people are on government. This is where the 3.6 trillion comes into play- you create handout programs and get people hooked.

So its time for election. The economy is still crap and you are dependent on government for existence. Here comes the republican party who wants to take away these programs (decrease the size of government- as it was intended...). Even if the economy is horrible it isn't going to matter. For the dems, the worse the better. An individual dependent on government for food, clothing, health ins, shelter, etc is not going to vote republican. Why? Because to do so would mean to cut themselves off from sustenance. A child doesn't voluntarily forfeit breast feeding.
So you see, the author says that Obama is bad for the market. He is right. But what many don't realize is that a bad market means the expansion of the democratic voter base. Why? Not unlike a pimp who keeps his girls close and loyal by getting them hooked on cocaine, Obama has instituted a program to make Americans and American businesses dependent on a Democrat-controlled house, senate, and executive branch and this dependence can only develop and augment when the economy is in the tank. When the economy is good, it inevitably leads to smaller government. Why? Because people have jobs and are keeping them. People and businesses are buying. Right now, the economy sucks. A population of democratic voters has been born and it is time for breast feeding.

So I Came Across Liberal Pandering to The Religious Right

Those of you going to Harding with me perhaps know J Cliff Ganus. I ran across this little gem on his blog I came by while browsing on Facebook. Get a load of this.... http://jcgraduate.blogspot.com/2008/08/why-christians-should-vote-for-obama.html

Yea, I realize the election is over...but the logic presented in his argument is worth revisiting. If you don't have the time or are easily sickened I will go ahead and sum up what he wrote: Christians should vote for Obama because it's what Jesus would have wanted. Why? Because Jesus was for the little guy.

Below, I copied and pasted his original post and my reply. Please note that on the issue of Jesus and politics I take great issue w/ both Republicans (and in this case...J Cliff?). It is unconstitutional to inject our personal religious convictions into our government and in the election of said government.

Why Christians should vote for Obama
I am a politically liberal person. I am a intellectually and socially liberal person. I am a aesthetically and entertainingly liberal person. With that said, it should not come as a surprise that I have chosen to vote for Barack Obama.

For the most part, the people I spend the majority of my time with have also chosen to vote for Senator Obama. However, there are still a few hold outs. (I state this to illustrate that I do actually associate with ignorant people, by choice even.)

I grow weary of political discourse, I find that it so often becomes a circular argument which ends by everyone leaving with their original views in tact and frequently refurbished. So I will leave "generic politics" out of this. I would like to state, for the record, why as a Christian I have chosen to lend my support...and why others should too.

1. Universal healthcare. Jesus calls us to take care of the poor, the weak, the downcast, the sinner. He requested that we minister to the prisoners and take care of the widows. As I recall, there was not a stipulation of "as long as it does not raise your taxes." In fact, the way I see it, He probably wants it to come out of our pocket. If this country truly was based on Christian principles (which I will contend at another time), then the church shouldn't be the only one doling out lettuce for those 'in need.'

2. End the war. These people are our enemies, they hurt us and hate us. When Jesus told us to love our enemies, he probably didn't mean for us to kill them. "Well, they don't listen to reason," "They are just hurting themselves," you might say. In response, I would like to quote this scripture:"And if after you go to your brother he does not change his ways, bomb him."

3. Hope, change, together we can. These phrases are often harped upon as being vague, meaningless jingles tossed about by the campaign. Even if that is true - what's the harm in talking about hope? What is the real shame in a man who is looking to bring a country together for good...even if the plan doesn't seem feasible? You want a man who is vague - try someone who promises a future in things we can't see, touch or taste. Try following a movement based solely on "faith," then tell me that you can't behind someone who offers hope for the future.

4. Experience. Jesus likes youth. He calls us to be like children, to approach the world with eyes full of potential and wonder. He encourages us to listen to our elders so that we can learn - but not to wait until we are elders ourselves to do things. From what I can tell, Obama has surrounded himself with people full of experience - and listens to their recommendations.

These are not the only reasons I am voting. I think Obama has solid policy, sound advice, a great wife, and an awesome brain in that head of his.

Now - someone tell me what about this is wrong.

MY RESONSE:

1. Universal healthcare. - Ok, yea...Jesus wants everybody to be healthy. Who doesn't? But the problem comes in paying for it. What I DON'T think Jesus would be down with is taking money out of someone else's pocket and giving it to someone else. Let me illustrate:There are 3 tenants living in a rent controlled apartment in NY (ex: John, Tom, Chris). John works hard and pays his bills ontime as best he can. Finances are tight and he is saving up for his son to go to college. Tom has also worked hard but has fallen under ill health. He is no longer able to afford rent and take care of his bills.We know that Chris doesn't work and survives by his parents' support.Chris, who it seems has always had a pension for trying to interfere in people's private lives, learns of Tom's misfortune. Just as anyone would, Chris feels bad for the guy. One day, Chris has had enough of seeing Tom suffer. He doesn't have any fiscal responsibility or earning capacity so he can't help Tom out. So what does he decide to do? He decides to hit John up for the moneyJohn says "I'm sorry, I just don't have it. I'd love to help Tom and I will if I am able but I am running a business in a HORRIBLE economy, barely getting by, barely able to afford rent and trying to put a kid through college. I just can't afford to lose any more money.Now Cliff, the CHRISTIAN thing to do would be to say "Hey, thanks for your willingness. Let me know if you are able to help him out in the future. God bless."What does Chris do (who, if you haven't figured it out, represents the government)? Chris knocks him down on the ground and at knifepoint and says "Sorry John. I'm not taking no for an answer. Tom needs your money and needs it now. Either fork it up or I slit your throat." Yes...I know that the government isn't looking to slit anyone's throat but a 20 year sentence for tax evasion isn't pretty either.That’s what you and the rest of the democrats want to do. Through confiscatory tax hikes, you feel that you have the right to MAKE someone else pay for someone else’s healthcare. Privately, sure…you should help the guy. I’m sorry but the fact that you equate tax hikes with being a ‘responsible Christian’ is blasphemous, incorrect, and obnoxious.

2. End the war-I am guessing you are attempting to quote the Koran. As you pointed out, the religion of Islam is dangerous. Your solution is to pull out and hope the situation fixes itself. What planet are you from!? This isn’t a ‘War on Terror’…terror is a tactic. This is a war on Islamic Fundamentalism. How do we ‘win’? Well, by establishing a beachhead for democracy in the middle east. The effects will be the free-flow of information and ideas. The ability for people to capitalize and succeed. The result? People won’t turn to a sham religion as a last resort in a time of 3rd world poverty. Let me know if you want to discuss this further. Especially regarding the Christian imperative.

3. Hope, change, together we can. - Yea, they are nice things to say. What’s my problem with it you ask? Well this: The guy won the election by promising hope and change. Never did he clearly say what he was going to change or how he was going to go about doing it. Just that he was. It just BLOWS MY MIND that people voted for the guy when most of them can’t name a thing he stands for. Are you really trying to tie Christianity to campaign slogans? Give me a break.

4. Experience- Jesus likes youth? Really? This is your contention? I mean….really? We are talking about the leader of the free world. You really think YOUTH is the selling point!?

You really shouldn’t advocate candidates on behalf of Jesus. That’s just not cool. And if you do, come up with something more substantial than “Jesus likes the lil’ ones.”

A Message To Democrats and (ESPECIALLY) Republicans

Are today's republicans also conservatives? Absolutely not.

I think its high time we define what it means to be a conservative and realize that calling yourself a republican is not, by ANY means, a conservative identification.
No congress, with the exception of the current democratic house, has blown through more money than the previous republican house. Heck, that's the reason why we have president-elect Barack Hussein Obama. America was sick and tired of republican spending. Especially since that spending favored the wealthy.

Obama said "change" and the people were game. It didn't necessarily matter what the nature of these changes were. Even if those changes included socialism. People wanted to punish President George W. Bush and the republican party he affiliates himself with to suffer for their wrongs. Truly, no man has hurt the cause of conservatism more than President Bush and, no party more than republicans .
Before we discuss the distinction between being a conservative and being a republican we should first define conservatism. Before you respond, please refrain from bringing a pocket knife to a gun show by quoting Webster. Most poly-sci books define conservatism using the phrase "maintenance of the status-quo." Democrats and modern liberals will take this and say "Yea! And our current 'status' is pathetic!". They are right. Our status is pathetic.

But is that really a conservative? Someone who just wants to keep things as they are? You ask a republican and he or she will tell you that conservatism is an attempt to protect "traditional American values." When you hear a republican utter this phrase from what seems to be right out of "Little House on the Prairie" please note: that person is probably not a conservative.
At this point, the "traditional American values" crowd starts to argue why religion should be in our government workings (schools, etc.). At this point do me a favor...slap them in the kidney and SCREAM "you are NOT a conservative!". To my friends who think religion SHOULD be in the classroom and in the legislature let me ask you a simple question: what if a different religion becomes the majority? Say, Islam. Fast forward 10 years and you women would be being fitted for a burka right about now. I love Christ just as much as the next guy but I, however, don't think He needs a government permission slip to make his presence known.

Ok so if conservatism has nothing to do with religious "traditional" values then what is it? One word: (the) Constitution. A true conservative is not trying to preserve religious values or whatever it was that was going through the minds of the pilgrims but rather The Constitution of the United States and, especially, it's Bill of Rights. To be a true conservative means to advocate the preservation of Constitutional law and principles. I keep a pocket Constitution in my pocket (to be redundant) and read it regularly (if you wish to be equally patriotic /dorky visit The Heritage Foundation for a free copy). Helen Keller could read the thing and tell you what responsibility it assigns to the government. The government's ONLY responsibility is to protect and conserve an individual's right to "life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness (sub. pursuit of happiness for "property" per the Declaration)." That's it. Case closed. That's ALL the thing allows the government to do to and on behalf of the individual. It is the INDIVIDUAL’S responsibility to create a life for him or herself.
Look at how far we have fallen from these principles today. Where once we were free to speak as we saw fit, we now have censors that are to do the parenting for us and a department of education that tells us how our kids are to be educated. Where once we were able to keep the money we earned for ourselves and for our families, we now have a confiscatory tax structure. Where once we were able to keep and maintain our land, we now have eminent domain. Folks, the list goes on.

Who's to blame? Democrats and modern liberals are naturally responsible for the confiscation of property through the application of redistributive and Marxian principles to our bank accounts.

Punish those who allocated their rights efficiently by taking money from them and giving it to those who did not. They make us overachieving bastards feel guilty by calling their beneficiaries "the less fortunate" as if the slightest success was the result of "good fortune." Through this semantical word play, they tell the successful individual that his or her success is only the result of luck; that the dice-playing gods bestowed success upon us. How insulting.
I'd like to pause and say something to the democrats and modern liberals directly: you have absolutely NO business in my wallet. None. Nadda. Zip.

Now you, republicans. Stop calling yourselves conservatives! Sure the democrats brought the money in but you are JUST as guilty with the way you spent it. Once you regained control in congress you had a golden opportunity: return the taxpayer's money to....who is that? THE TAXPAYERS. But you squandered that opportunity, didn't you? You filled the legislature with just as much pork as the democrats...if not more! Oh...and No Child Left Behind? Nice one there pubs. Threw money at a horrible Department of Education. That's like trying to fix a deadbeat rich kid who grew up with no lessons in responsibility by giving him money!

Still more republican violations...you feel like it's important that you control what's on someone else's TV. You feel like censoring someone else's kid's entertainment will make your kid behave and decrease the possibility of a backseat romp. How dare you think you have the right to do the parenting for someone else. You also, for some reason I can't figure out, take issue with what two consenting adults do in the privacy of a bedroom. Here is where the "traditional American values" usually comes up among the republican crowd who try to describe themselves as conservatives. Give me a break.

There are so many more republican and democratic violations of The Constitution. I could literally fill a whole book on these crimes.

Look...Republicans, I understand you feel that you have the right to intrude on someone else's liberty and pursuit of happiness. Democrats, I understand (ok not really but for the sake of argument) you feel you have the right to steal from and violate the rights one person and give it to another. However, I do have something to say to each of you:

Dems: You know how I feel. I don't like you. You feel you have the right to reach into other people's bank accounts and give what you find to someone else. If an individual did what you are doing as a democrat driven congress, he or she would be arrested and prosecuted for felony fraud. If I rob a bank and take all the money to the poor house I am still guilty of theft. I took it from someone who earned it.
Republicans: I used to be among you. That is, before I read the Constitution. You feel like you have the right to control a family's and individual's very lives. You use "traditional American values" as a catchphrase allowing you to pontificate the intrusion of government into the lives of Americans; subsequently violating each of our rights. You (rightfully) persecute the democrats for illegally confiscating money from the pocketbooks of the Americans who earn it yet spend that very money like a redneck at a yard sale. Most importantly, STOP CALLING YOURSELVES CONSERVATIVES!!

So to you both...do me a favor and make up your mind. Either:

a) Recognize the individual's unquestionable right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. Only support candidates who uphold the Constitution and advocate that the individual has the right to do whatever he wants, whenever he wants; as long as it doesn't interfere with someone else's rights to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

b) Refrain from celebrating freedom on July 4th. It makes me sick. You people want true freedom about as much as cancer and you frankly belong in a dictatorship.


If you are still a dem or "traditional" republican....I hope NOT to see you on the 4th or the polls, for that matter. Oops too late.

More on Islam

If you thought I was a right-winged bigot before, wait till you get a load of this. Do I see myself as a right-winged bigot? No, not on most issues. But regarding Islam, however, I am guilty as charged. You see, I am not afraid of offending Muslims any more than I am of offending Christians (of whom I happen to be), Jews, and athiests.

Most of America, especccccccccially the left, are outright cowards and hypocrites when it comes to Islam....only ISLAM. The left want us to respect the word Islam yet accept the term 'fundamentalist Christian' as a punch line.

The New York Times is a real ring leader in this regard. They are so critical about how Muslims are treated and passed strong judgements through their regular columns and editorials about the cartoon in Belgium. Unless you have been living under a rock, you know what I am talking about. A Belgian newspaper had a cartoon where Muhammad was depicted with a bomb as a turban. How DARE they disrespect the Muslim people. Here's the funny part though...Chris Ofili... he is famous for his “Holy Virgin Mary" painting. This, however, is not your average Mary painting. This little gem was made using porn cut-outs and elephant dung.

How did the left treat this one? The NYT praised it and rendered it as a 'creatively artistic and unique approach towards depicting the "Virgin Mary".' What happened when Christians expressed outrage? We were portrayed as lacking artistic appreciation. Sooooo...let me get this straight....you are allowed to depict the Virgin Mary using turds and Penthouse but some dinky newspaper in Belgium can't depict the "peaceful" Mohammed with a bomb on his head? Using INK!?

Let's take a look at the reactions to these situations: Christians reacting to the Virgin/crap painting? A few of them expressed disapproval by writing letters to the Brooklyn Museum asking them to take it down. Some appealed to Major Guiliani. Muslims? Well, they rioted and blew a bunch of crap up. I'm considering commissioning an artist to paint me a picture of Mr. Mohammed using urine, semen, and elephant dung. Think they would be mad?

I look at the difference in reactions and ask myself....what is it about these terrorists that makes them tick? Why do they hate us SO much? I came up with a terrifying answer. THEIR RELIGION. Don't believe me yet? Here a few quotes from the little darling's "spiritual text"...

Qur'an:9:5 "Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war."

Qur'an:9:29 "Fight those who do not believe until they all surrender, paying the protective tax in submission."

Ishaq:325 "Muslims, fight in Allah's Cause. Stand firm and you will prosper. Help the Prophet, obey him, give him your allegiance, and your religion will be victorious."

Qur'an:8:39 "Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah." Qur'an:8:39 "So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief [non-Muslims]) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole world)."

Ishaq:587 "Our onslaught will not be a weak faltering affair. We shall fight as long as we live. We will fight until you turn to Islam, humbly seeking refuge.

Bukhari:V4B53N386 "Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah alone or pay us the Jizyah tribute tax in submission. Our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says: 'Whoever amongst us is killed as a martyr shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever survives shall become your master.'" Isn't this one precious?

MY FAVORITE: Qur'an:47:4 "When you clash with the unbelieving Infidels in battle (fighting Jihad in Allah's Cause), smite their necks until you overpower them, killing and wounding many of them. At length, when you have thoroughly subdued them, bind them firmly, making (them) captives. Thereafter either generosity or ransom (them based upon what benefits Islam) until the war lays down its burdens. Thus are you commanded by Allah to continue carrying out Jihad against the unbelieving infidels until they submit to Islam."

If practiced in full, Islam is perhaps the most deadly force on the planet. In Guantanamo Bay, inmates are each given fresh new copies of the Qu'Ran. Are you KIDDING!? That's like giving Jeffrey Dahmer the Joy of Cooking!!! Folks, we have to stop being so politically correct and realize our truth. We are not fighting a War on Terror. Terror is a tactic. This is a War on Fundamentalist Islam.

There are many people I know who claim to be Muslims. Some of the best and kindest people I have ever met. However, their kindness is IN SPITE of their religion. As you can see in the above quotes, Islam teachings instruct believers to hate and kill infidels (those who don't believe in Mohammed- aka ME).

Sorry, but I am just not wired to be down with a religion that wants me dead. And I'm definitely not wired to watch the P/C left wing nut jobs convince you and your's that America is 'mean to Muslims'. Listening to them whine about Guantanamo makes me want to PUKE. Hey, I say that if you can pay someone in LA to do it to you, it's not torture. And waterboarding? Boo.HOO. If you ask me, America isn’t mean enough.

If we said the same things about Muslims that the left says about Christians, we would all be slaughtered (yes I know there are left wing Christians..don't get me started). If you have a problem with what I am saying then I beg you to answer this question: Why is it okay to say things about Christians but not Muslims? Especially when Muslims are the ones that want us to die….?

One thing that I think that would protect us is racial/gender profiling in public arenas (airports, etc.). Did you know that every terrorist attack on U.S. soil since the late 70s has been conducted by male Muslims...100% of them. Oh and don't try to knock me down by throwing out qoutes on McVeigh and Colombine. They aren't terrorists. They didn't do what they did to achieve an end or address a grievance. They did it to kill. Muslims are doing it to restore the Muslim caliphate (research this- TERRIFYING).

This is not me being a bigot or me profiling. When it's 100%, it's no longer called a profile. It's called a description of the suspect.

The Curious Logic of a Liberal

Last night I couldn't sleep. Instead of lying awake awkwardly with my eyes open I decided to pull out my notebook and jot down a few things about my passion (disdain for liberals). It blows my mind how ridiculous some of their logic can be. Here are just a few...more to come.

• Obesity is a huge (no pun intended) problem/ Starvation is also a huge problem.

• "We [liberals] celebrate diversity and differences" / if you disagree with Darwinian theory or oppose abortion than you are a stupid and/or 'dangerous'

• Save the trees/ allow aborting a human fetus

• Race: Claim to fight for equality yet when it comes to the workplace and education, affirmative action takes hold and places the minority about everyone else. I.e, the best way to fight discrimination is through discrimination. Oh, I see. I suppose the best way to fight rape is through rape?

• Bush mastermind 9/11. This is interesting when considering the constant banter that Bush is an idiot.

• Liberals claim to be "pro-choice" yet oppose adoption organizations counseling pregnant mothers on adoption. So pro-choice REALLY means "pro-abortion".

• Claim to feels sorry for Americans who can't fill their gas tanks yet protest the drilling of oil (which, as anyone with the IQ above a toaster knows, will decrease our price on oil).

• Liberals morned the executions of Tookie Williams, Ted Bundy, and other darlings on death row yet get an erection at the thought of a CEO going to jail.

• Liberals demanded that mortgage companies make loans to poor people yet, in the wake of Fannie and Freddy's collapse, accuse mortgage companies of "irresponsible lending."

• Republicans are racists. Many liberals bring up the 3/5 compromise as being an idea of the Republican party at the time. Yea, damn straight. Anybody who paid attention in middle school history knows that this was done so slave owners couldn't force their slaves to vote/act how they wanted. The purpose was to make sure the slave states didn't outnumber the free states. Republicans are the folks who freed the slaves.

• Worst economy in decades. Solution? A tax increase!!

• Liberal Hollywood bemoans the poor poor pitiful poor while demanding millions for each film they star in.

• Claim they want the 'working man' to be successful yet punish him/her when he achieves success.

• What in the hell is the 'working class.' If you make a good income does that mean you aren't 'working'?

• Impeach Bush / worship Clinton...hey, Clinton lied to our faces...WHILE shaking his finger at us. Guess what? The whole world thought there were WMDs in Iraq.

• Liberal feminists want 'equal rights' with men. Cool. All for it. But do me a favor...don't gripe about maternity benefits. You want equality, you got it.

• Students hang a mannequin of Obama at KU. Their purpose was to display humorous disdain towards Obama (NOT his race). 2 guys in LA (of course...where else?) hang a display of Sarah Palin and the left claims it to be 'humorous expression.' Which is it? Can you or can you not make jokes about public officials being hanged?

• Against cruelty to animals (despite the fact that, barring human interference, animals are cruel to each other) but have no problem sticking a fork in an unborn baby's skull.

• Demand tolerance towards Muslims/ are anything but tolerant towards Christians

• Liberals claim Christianity is bigoted towards homosexuals...hey, you should see what your pals the Muslims do to them.

• Liberal ivy league schools now have "free speech zones" in which conservative students are 'allowed' to debate. This used to comprise of a somewhat larger zone known as the United States of America.

• "Iraq isn't our civil war to fight" / "we must interfere in Darfur's civil war" Has anyone heard an exit strategy for Darfur, because I haven't?

• If communist czar Joseph Stalin had targeted blacks then we would have a Joe McCarthy day. McCarthy made being a communist shameful. Liberals whined. Not unless a minority is being oppressed do they feel satisfied.

• "Palin didn't have enough experience to be vice-president". Hey, guess what. She was governor of a resource-rich state. Obama was on the Senate for 3 years. Obama's experience pails in comparison to Palin's. He isn't any more qualified than she is for vice president. Let alone, president!

• The New York Times and other left-leaning publications criticized a Belgian newspaper for publishing a cartoon in which Mohammad was depicted with a bomb. However, when the artist Ofili's 'The Holy Virgin Mary' was published in a New York museum, the NYT praised it. No problem, right? Oh, wait....I forgot to mention that he painted the picture using elephant dung and porn-mag cut outs. It's okay to be critical of religions as long as it's not Islam.

These are just a FEW of the hypocrisies liberals engage in on a daily basis. I haven't decided yet whether or not I am going to elaborate on any of these points. Either way, expect more soon. Thanks, Nash.

Guantanamo, The Joy of Cooking, and Islam

B. Hussein Obama has repeatedly indicated that he plans to close the United States base in Guantanamo bay, Cuba. The shut-down will not, however, be because of a lack of inefficiency. President elect Obama and several other liberals suffering from Obsessive Compulsive Compassion Disorder feel that the United States is just a smidge too mean to these guys. The feel that inmates are being bullied at this facility.

Here is a list of some of the bullying tactics:
- Taxpayer support for prosthetic limbs. The injuries incurred by these little darlings were the result of the very explosion they tried to kill civilians with. (See Abdullah Massoud's procedure in 2001 which cost the U.S. Taxpayer between ($50,000-75,000)

- Menu items such as: Glazed orange chicken, fresh fruit, and rice pilaf

- It is one of the only detention facilities in the world where prisoners are leaving with weight GAIN.

- Upon leaving, each inmate is provided with a new copy of the Koran and a fresh pair of jeans





Wait... they are given a copy the KORAN? I like how Ann Coulter equated this provision with "giving Jeffrey Dahmer 'The Joy of Cooking.'"

Here are a few loving quotes from the Koran:

• "If you should die or be slain in the cause of God, His forgiveness and His mercy would surely be better than all the riches..." (Surah 3:156-)

• "Seek out your enemies relentlessly." (Surah 4:103-)

• "The Jews and Christians say: 'We are the children of God and His loved ones.' Say: 'Why then does He punish you for your sins?" (Surah 5:18)

• 
  "Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends." (Surah 5:51)

• 
  "The God will say: 'Jesus, son of Mary, did you ever say to mankind 'Worship me and my mother as gods besides God?' 'Glory to You, 'he will answer, 'how could I ever say that to which I have no right?" (Surah 5:114-)

• 
  "Believers, when you encounter the infidels on the march, do not turn your backs to them in flight. If anyone on that day turns his back to them, except it be for tactical reasons...he shall incur the wrath of God and Hell shall be his home..." (Surah 8:12-)

• 
  "Make war on them until idolatry shall cease and God's religion shall reign supreme." (Surah 8:36-)

• 
  "If you fear treachery from any of your allies, you may fairly retaliate by breaking off your treaty with them." (Surah 8:51-)

• 
  "...make war on the leaders of unbelief...Make war on them: God will chastise them at your hands and humble them. He will grant you victory over them..." (Surah 9:12-)

• "If you do not fight, He will punish you sternly, and replace you by other men." (Surah 9:37-)

• "Believers, make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Deal firmly with them." (Surah 9:121-)

• "Fight for the cause of God with the devotion due to Him...He has given you the name of Muslims..." (Surah 22:78-)

• "Blessed are the believers...who restrain their carnal desires (except with their wives and slave-girls, for these are lawful to them)...These are the heirs of Paradise..." (Surah 23:1-5-)

• "Muhammad is God's apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another." (Surah 48:29)

And don't give me any of this crap about Judeo-Christian teachings being chalked full of violence. 2 things:

a) it was God doing the violence in the Old Testament, not His believers. In the Koran, God needs impressionable idiots to do it for him.

b) forgiveness is the cornerstone of the New Testament. Forgiveness, in Islamic texts, is considered weak. Oh wait! There is a stipulation...if they convert to Islam THEN you can forgive them. Until then, they are on us non-Muslims like a rabbit on a cheetah.

Christian text says "Love your enemies." Islamic text tells you to kill them (but ONLY after given an opportunity to convert to Islam...at knife-point, obviously). Don't get me wrong...there are plenty of wonderful people who call themselves Muslims. They just choose to ignore certain tidbits from the Koran.

So here is the painful truth...the teachings of the Koran and the expansion of Islam are perhaps the most dangerous threats our society faces today.

Let's call this war what it is. War on Terror? No. That's like saying War on Meanness. This is a War on Islamic Fascism.